Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 5:02:24 GMT
Of teachers - and in some cases by researchers and politicians via video - who must analyze how the teacher planned the classes, what specific objectives he achieved with them, what difficulties he had and where he made mistakes. In Hong Kong, schools also carry out annual evaluations, which are then reviewed every three to six years by the government. Informal and based on trust Informal and based on trust But not all teacher evaluation systems are defined at the national level or are so formal. In Finland, a country that has lost positions in the latest PISA reports but continues to be an important educational benchmark internationally, the way of measuring teacher performance is much more informal. It was in the early 1990s when this northeastern European country abolished the school inspection system, and today the evaluation is carried out in each school, based on conversations between the teacher himself and his director. In Finland the teacher evaluation system is more informal and based on trust.
It is a model based on trust,” says Paulo Santiago, analyst at the OECD Education and Skills Directorate. But there is no system that serves as a reference for everyone, agree the experts consulted by BBC Mundo. "You have to adapt it to the context," Santiago emphasizes. Furthermore, it depends on the objective of the evaluations; That Bahamas Mobile Number List is, whether its purpose is to measure the quality of teaching in each classroom and identify those teachers who do not perform their work as they should, or whether the objective is to offer constructive criticism to teachers so that they advance in their career. Although for an evaluation model to work, experts agree that it must meet the following characteristics: measurement standards must be well established, teachers must know them, and those who evaluate them must be well trained. Latin American panorama
The problem, acknowledged the director of Conafe, is that the teachers who managed to obtain a place on their own merit in the entrance competitions do not want to go to those locations, much less the teachers who are already in service; In those corners immersed in the mountains, the jungle or the forest, they only accept teaching classes to young people from those same marginalized communities who, at the same time, want to study high school or a professional career, and they teach classes in exchange for a scholarship of 1,400 monthly pesos. “The teachers, when they go to the most remote community, after six months they are asking for a change. That would have to be corrected, such as giving incentives to teachers who go to the communities and then stay, because any Mexican has the same right to education as everyone else, even if they live in the most remote areas, but in the case of the SEP “We are serving this segment with institutions like Conafe,” he admitted.
