Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 4:22:10 GMT
This month of March is full of events. Without a doubt the most important of them is the attack, occupation and bombing of Ukrainian cities and lands by the President of Russia, Mr. Vladimir Putin. Mr. is mere courtesy. That's on the planet, but in Spain we complete the picture with the change of position of the Spanish government regarding the dispute with Morocco and UN resolution where the Sahrawi people's right to free self-determination was recognized. . And that resolution favored, by the way, a ceasefire between Morocco and the Polisario Front. There have been many UN resolutions on the subject, such as the 2021 resolution, which calls for a solution that is realistic , viable and lasting . Well, a few days ago - on the 14th of this month - we read with some astonishment that the president of the Spanish government sent a letter to the king of Morocco in which he said that "Spain considers that the Moroccan proposal for autonomy presented in 2007 - to the UN– as the most serious , credible and realistic basis for the resolution of this dispute .” And he ended by saying that “All these actions will be carried out in order to guarantee the stability and integrity of our two countries.
Until that moment, the government of Spain had maintained a self-determination referendum in accordance with previous resolutions as a solution to the problem of the situation of the Sahrawi people. As in politics, things can be examined from both sides of the same coin: from the side of ethics, principles, from the side of UN resolutions or, from the other side, from the side Chinese Thailand Phone Number List of realpolitik . Since the first, all Congress parties except the PSOE have criticized the change in position for different reasons. The PP is the exception, because it has done it in a cynical way, criticizing the forms – they had not been counted on – but without questioning the underlying issue because, we know, that deep down they agree with what has been done now. The USA, France, now Germany, for example, maintained what is now the official Spanish position. The USA supports the Moroccan annexation of Western Sahara – or Spanish Sahara – just as it has been supporting Morocco through the sale of weapons to favor possible agreements on the mining riches of this part of North Africa. That is to say, even though the USA and Spain belong to the same military organization.
That is NATO, the USA, with the same cynicism with which we spoke before, is an ally of Morocco in its claim for itself of the cities of Ceuta and Melilla. And, furthermore, the war in Ukraine had the danger that the satrap of Morocco, spurred by Putin in order to open a second front between Russia and Europe, would take advantage of the opportunity to send troops or, worse still, civilians to force entry. in both cities, something it has already done or, at least, favored. Support for Polisario comes from principles of democratic ethics Spain abandoned its responsibility over the Spanish province of the Sahara when in 1975 it let the Moroccan people occupy it through the famous green march , an action promoted by another satrap, the grandfather of the current one. That is one of the legacies of Francoism that occurred when the dictator was dying and, therefore, still under the dictatorship.
Until that moment, the government of Spain had maintained a self-determination referendum in accordance with previous resolutions as a solution to the problem of the situation of the Sahrawi people. As in politics, things can be examined from both sides of the same coin: from the side of ethics, principles, from the side of UN resolutions or, from the other side, from the side Chinese Thailand Phone Number List of realpolitik . Since the first, all Congress parties except the PSOE have criticized the change in position for different reasons. The PP is the exception, because it has done it in a cynical way, criticizing the forms – they had not been counted on – but without questioning the underlying issue because, we know, that deep down they agree with what has been done now. The USA, France, now Germany, for example, maintained what is now the official Spanish position. The USA supports the Moroccan annexation of Western Sahara – or Spanish Sahara – just as it has been supporting Morocco through the sale of weapons to favor possible agreements on the mining riches of this part of North Africa. That is to say, even though the USA and Spain belong to the same military organization.
That is NATO, the USA, with the same cynicism with which we spoke before, is an ally of Morocco in its claim for itself of the cities of Ceuta and Melilla. And, furthermore, the war in Ukraine had the danger that the satrap of Morocco, spurred by Putin in order to open a second front between Russia and Europe, would take advantage of the opportunity to send troops or, worse still, civilians to force entry. in both cities, something it has already done or, at least, favored. Support for Polisario comes from principles of democratic ethics Spain abandoned its responsibility over the Spanish province of the Sahara when in 1975 it let the Moroccan people occupy it through the famous green march , an action promoted by another satrap, the grandfather of the current one. That is one of the legacies of Francoism that occurred when the dictator was dying and, therefore, still under the dictatorship.