Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 4:43:44 GMT
Jesus Espelosin JESUS ESPELOSIN MAY The dismissal of the director of the National Intelligence Center brings to my memory several scenes from spy movies with her as the protagonist. Paz Esteban is a spy with ten three-year terms in the CNI. She is, therefore, a professional with a determined vocation and not like, for example, Harry Palmer, that Len Deighton character played several times by Michael Caine and whose dedication to the profession was motivated by avoiding a military prison. But Esteban was not a field agent, like Mata Hari or James Bond, but an analyst like Jack Ryan, the hero created by Tom Clancy. Like Jack Ryan in " Imminent Danger , Paz Esteban has found herself responsible for a mission that is no longer secret And, like Jack Ryan from " Imminent Danger ", Paz Esteban has found herself responsible for a mission that is no longer secret. If you remember, a colleague of Ryan's showed her a paper with the order, signed by a superior, entrusting her with the task while she asked Ryan. “Do you have paper.
But unlike in the film, Esteban has not been able to save himself because Jack Ryan, to do so, had to become a field agent, something that has not been possible for our protagonist. All movie buffs know the hardness of the life of a spy, not so much when things are going well as when they get caught. If that moment occurs in time of war, the normal thing is that they are shot Costa Rica WhatsApp Number preventively, while, if it has been in time of peace, it can be converted into a bargaining chip for someone or something. As seems to have been the case. In " The Bridge of Spies ", Rudolf Abel, the Russian spy discovered, detained and exchanged, maintains a very dignified attitude in his situation, which can serve as an example for Paz Esteban's current behavior. The response that Abel gives, several times, when it is pointed out to him that he is not worried since he limits himself to asking, Would he be of any use is already part of the history of cinema? In our case it seems that an exchange has taken place, but not on the Glienicke bridge on the Havel river, but on a bridge on the Ebro river. And the transaction has consisted of exchanging a spy for an improvement in the conditions for the political stability of the government of Spain.
Although for many it means prolonging Sanchismo with the usual accompaniment of populists, separatists and friends of terrorists, which is why criticism has rained down on the President of the Government. Naturally, these criticisms have not been based on the desire for Pedro Sánchez to retire as soon as possible, but rather on the discredit that the episode may have for Spain in the world of spies. Chekhov said that if a weapon appears in the first act of a play, that weapon should be used in the second or third act. If not, his appearance in the plot was superfluous. In our work, someone's dismissal appeared from the first moment so, sooner or later, it had to be shot. And it was the turn of the spy chief. Although I imagine the negotiation experienced until reaching it. Those affected by espionage, very predictably, would demand the head of the Minister of Defense, a demand that would also possibly be counter-offered by the dismissal of some CNI supporter. In the end, and after the corresponding tug-of-war, the agreement was closed in Paz Esteban. It also seems to me that it should have been agreed upon right up to the moment If Mrs.
But unlike in the film, Esteban has not been able to save himself because Jack Ryan, to do so, had to become a field agent, something that has not been possible for our protagonist. All movie buffs know the hardness of the life of a spy, not so much when things are going well as when they get caught. If that moment occurs in time of war, the normal thing is that they are shot Costa Rica WhatsApp Number preventively, while, if it has been in time of peace, it can be converted into a bargaining chip for someone or something. As seems to have been the case. In " The Bridge of Spies ", Rudolf Abel, the Russian spy discovered, detained and exchanged, maintains a very dignified attitude in his situation, which can serve as an example for Paz Esteban's current behavior. The response that Abel gives, several times, when it is pointed out to him that he is not worried since he limits himself to asking, Would he be of any use is already part of the history of cinema? In our case it seems that an exchange has taken place, but not on the Glienicke bridge on the Havel river, but on a bridge on the Ebro river. And the transaction has consisted of exchanging a spy for an improvement in the conditions for the political stability of the government of Spain.
Although for many it means prolonging Sanchismo with the usual accompaniment of populists, separatists and friends of terrorists, which is why criticism has rained down on the President of the Government. Naturally, these criticisms have not been based on the desire for Pedro Sánchez to retire as soon as possible, but rather on the discredit that the episode may have for Spain in the world of spies. Chekhov said that if a weapon appears in the first act of a play, that weapon should be used in the second or third act. If not, his appearance in the plot was superfluous. In our work, someone's dismissal appeared from the first moment so, sooner or later, it had to be shot. And it was the turn of the spy chief. Although I imagine the negotiation experienced until reaching it. Those affected by espionage, very predictably, would demand the head of the Minister of Defense, a demand that would also possibly be counter-offered by the dismissal of some CNI supporter. In the end, and after the corresponding tug-of-war, the agreement was closed in Paz Esteban. It also seems to me that it should have been agreed upon right up to the moment If Mrs.
